Friday, April 15, 2005

Really reaching

New York Times:

Democrats, for their part, are already stepping up their efforts to link Dr. Frist and the [nuclear option] with conservatives [sic] statements about unaccountable judges hostile to faith.

Hey, if the shoe fits. The question is whether the Republicans will chicken out again and let the Democrats continue to stack the judicial deck with activists and secularists. Chuckie Shumer weighs in:

"The last thing we need is inflammatory rhetoric which on its face encourages violence against judges," he wrote.

Very lame, Chuckie. Opposition to judicial activism constitutes incitement to violence? Have you been reading the NY Times Op-Ed section?

Is this a new meme now: "If you disagree with us you're violent and must be stopped"?